![]() ![]() Option 2 (document comparison level): Code frequency in the document This option can be useful, for example, if you are working with relatively short documents, such as free text responses to a survey, and with a large number of codes. The criterion is the occurrence or absence of a code in the document (i.e.: code occurs vs. Option 1 (document comparison level): Code occurrence in the document In the lower area you can choose between three alternative analysis levels:.You can limit the analysis to the currently activated documents and/or codes by selecting the appropriate options.Select the document group or document set with the document assigned to Coder 1 in the upper drop-down menu and the document assigned to Coder 2 in the lower drop-down menu.The "Document System" will look like this: Use the function Home > Merge Projects to merge both projects into one.Both coders independently code the data and add new codes if necessary necessary (it might be helpful to agree on a specific code color for these new codes).Both coders write their names behind all document groups.Pass this project copy on to the second coder.Using the Home > Project from Activated Documents function, create a project copy that contains only the previously activated documents. Activate the documents that are to be coded by a second person.Make sure that all documents to be coded by a second person are assigned to a document group (it does not have to be the same document group, the documents can also be distributed across several groups). ![]() The documents must have the same name, but must be in different document groups. The two identical documents coded by different coders must be contained in the same MAXQDA project.Of course, it is important that both coders cannot see what the other person has coded. This can be done on the same computer or on separate computers. Two coders process the identical document independently and code it according to mutually agreed code definitions.The intercoder agreement procedureĬhecking the intercoder agreement involves the following: Instead, qualitative researchers want to address and edit the code assignments that do not match, so that they can move on with more accurately coded material. the percentage of matching code assignments). For this reason, one doesn’t focus on the coefficient or percentage of agreement (i.e. Rather, the focus is on a practical improvement of the coding quality. It is not, however, focused on getting to a standard coefficient that is statistically necessary as in quantitative research. It is always the goal of qualitative analysts to achieve as high a level of agreement as possible between independent coders. This percentage is, however, provided by MAXQDA. In other words, the actual percentage of agreement is not the most important aspect of the tool. In qualitative research, the purpose of comparing independent coders is to discuss the differences, figure out why they occurred, and learn from the differences in order to improve coding agreement in the future. The MAXQDA Intercoder Agreement function makes it possible to compare two people coding the same document independently of each other. You assume, for example, that coding is not arbitrary or random, but rather that a certain level of reliability will be reached. When assigning codes to qualitative data, it is recommended that certain criteria be set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |